The SNP Scourge

On the 5th of May 2011 Scotland voted for the multi-racial advocating SNP on an unprecedented scale, resulting in disaster not just for every other political party in the country (including us), but also for the nations cultural and social future. For you see, now that the "fake nationalists" have overall control in Scotland, it is evidently clear they are frantically trying to push through as many of their zany ideas as possible, ideas that those who voted SNP probably had no clue about and more than likely oppose. The reason I say this is because the vast majority of those who vote SNP do so solely on the misguided basis of "independence" that the SNP like to play on. These individuals honestly believe that we are living under the tyranny of English rule and that we were somehow historically conquered by England militarily, whereas the truth is that our nation willingly entered into an act of political union with England. They overlook the times this union has benefited Scotland to focus on the occasions it has short-changed us, which granted it has but we are certainly not oppressed from "London Rule," far from it. These people are, as stated, misguided and they need educated as to what a vote for the SNP truly entails. So for the benefit of them here goes:

- How long will it be before Alex, the notorious gambler, thanks the odds are in his favour before he calls an Independence referendum?

Surely if ever there was a time to call for an Independence referendum, it would have been riding on the momentum of practically wiping out the opposition at the Scottish elections. Why did Alex not do this? His official excuse is that it was never their intentions in their manifesto to immediately call for a referendum and that it would be unscrupulous to break their pledges. Laughable - when has breaking promises ever bothered them in the past? Just google "100 broken SNP promises" to see what I mean.

No, Alex is a slippery toad and he knows there is no way the SNP will ever win a majority yes in an Independence referendum. For although Scotland may have voted overwhelmingly for the SNP at Holyrood, when it comes to the real elections that matter with regards Westminster the SNP are somewhat insignificant and can only muster 6 MP's with 20% of the vote. It seems the public are willing to let Alex play pretend-president with the toy-town parliament but just don't trust him on the big stage. What is even more laughable was how Alex was boasting beforehand of how Westminster would be dancing to a Scottish Jig after seeking a coalition with the SNP!!!! I'm afraid Alex the only tune Westminster is dancing to is a Hebrew Hymn played by Israel but that is for another time.

Back to the referendum, as usual Alex is playing it slyly for calling a referendum now would lead to his utter humiliation through total defeat and the ensuing loss of faith in the SNP would make the next 4 years very uneasy for them, whereas if he calls the referendum in 2014 and is denied holding one (a very likely scenario), he will use this as the backbone of his 2015 election campaign. Mark my words on that but in the meantime I'd like to tell Alex there's only one way he'll win a referendum and that is if he is given a +30% handicap, and even then the bookies would probably still be odds-on for a resounding "no"!!

The National Front are certainly not against offering the true people of Scotland a referendum on Independence, however (with the risk of repeating ourselves) we believe that the threat posed by Alex Salmond and his traitorous cronies is far more dangerous to our well-being at the moment. Our biggest threat now, if not ever, is mass-immigration and lets deal with that first before we seek a split of the Union and besides, the issue of independence has been around for over 300 hundred years, I'm sure it can wait a wee while longer until we deal with the problem at hand first.

We also understand there are indeed Scottish White Nationalists (along with members of the public who support our views) who seek Independence and thus refuse to belong to a pro-Union party, with them believing that if Scotland does indeed gain independence under the SNP then we can try to run for the Scottish Parliament and unseat them. To put it bluntly for them, even within the UK the White Nationalist scene has taken somewhat of a beating of late and is desperately needing to regroup and find its direction - what chance would Scotland's WN scene have on it's own? The damage caused by an independent Scotland under the SNP would be unrepairable so to recap for them, first we deal with the mass-immigration problem then we discuss the sideshow of independence.

It is clear Allah Salmond will not call for independence anytime soon nor will he likely achieve it, so for those of you who did vote SNP on the basis of independence I'm afraid to tell you that voting for the SNP will lead to nothing but ruin for our nation, ruin which I shall discuss in further detail throughout the rest of this page. For starters, I'll discuss the 3 laws the SNP have proposed in such a short space of time, did you agree to this when voting SNP:

- Do you really agree with the new Anti-Sectarian law?

This is the first law to be passed by the SNP and on the surface this bill is fobbed off as some sort of law to be admired in that it is aiming to eradicate Sectarian hate at football matches, yet take a little look into the actual legislation and you will soon see it is a law open to abuse by the authorities that will see many people criminalised for simply shouting/swearing/typing the "wrong thing." It was promoted as eradicating Sectarian hate at football matches yet someone sitting at home on a match day posting a silly comment online can be prosecuted??!! Oh and it is not just anti-catholic/protestant remarks that can land you in trouble either - anything negative said about a persons faith, nationality, race, sexual orientation, gender, probably breed of pet dog (!!) will land you in hot water and facing upto 5 years in jail, yes 5 years. More than what carrying a knife will - how can that be justifiable?

Going to the football used to be a working class dominated pursuit and it was accepted that when you paid your money you could shout, swear and sing to your hearts content about literally anything that took your fancy for the 90 minutes of the match. Winding up players and riling the opposition fans was all part of the package, yet these days they only seem to want "sensible" people paying over the odds with the only noise being the rustling of some dolled-up lassies sweetie wrappers! Now of course there should be limits to what can be sung/shouted but come on I certainly would not want anyone calling me a "sheep-shagging bastard" to be prosecuted - after all that is offending sexual-orientation so they probably could be!!

In all seriousness though this law is doing nothing but extending the restriction of freedom of speech in this country even further and it was interesting how, despite widespread opposition from a range of spectrum's such as football fans (both Rangers and Celtic), religious organisations, anti-sectarianism organisations, children's charities, the Law Society, the Human Rights Commission and the Scottish Justices Association, the SNP defied everyone and railroaded the bill through regardless even though there was already ample legislation in place to deal with hate/sectarian crime. Surely the organisations listed above are more experienced and qualified in the field of Sectarian hate at football than the politicians of the SNP and their concerns should have been listened to and the bill scrapped?

This is simply a wee taster of things to come under the SNP in that they will do as they like regardless of the opposition as they now have the majority thanks to the independence fixated voters. Just how many of them agree with the easy criminalisation of football fans? This law will have the same consequences as the racially-aggravated charge in that those championing its introduction now will be the ones left reeling when they fall under it's oppressive boot.

- Do you agree with the introduction of minimum pricing of alcohol?

Again. this is a bill where the concept is admirable but the practice is flawed yet (just as in the anti-sectarian law above) the SNP are using the majority gifted to them to again do as they please regardless of what the experts tell them. Interestingly, this bill was defeated the last time it was proposed in parliament and Nicola Sturgeon is obviously just trying to restore her dented pride by re-proposing it knowing she can now do as she pleases. It certainly appears as well that Sturgeon is simply trying to boost her already inflated ego by being some sort or trend-setter globally by being the first in the world to introduce a minimum price per alcohol unit. If it was such a great idea I'm sure other nations would have implemented it already.

Of course, we could be cynical here and ask whether Sturgeon is also trying to curry flavour with the Islamic people within Scotland, for pushing through laws that restrict the sale of booze would more than likely please the followers of Islam and Sturgeon certainly does have a deep affection for those people. Past evidence of this includes her close relationship with Bashir Ahmad, who she regarded as a kind of father figure. Even more worrying was when she personally intervened in the fraud case against Abdul Rauf when, despite him being found guilty of £80000 worth of benefit fraud and having previous for stealing £40000 when he was a post-master, she wrote a personal letter pleading the court not to send him to jail!! Unbelievable yet we expect nothing less from the Muslim loving SNP, which we shall read more about later on.

Back to the alcohol law, I'd be here all night describing the ins and outs of it so I'll summarise it to the extent that the law will do nothing but increase the profits of shopkeepers/supermarkets and penalise sensible drinkers. People want to get smashed off their faces I'm afraid and price is not a barrier to them - that is the plain and simple truth. Those with a drink problem are not gonna be fazed by an extra couple of quid on their cheap cider and if anything it will lead to an increase in crime caused by them to fund their habit or they will just steal the booze. No, as usual it is the sensible members of society who are punished and even if they increased the price beyond their limit, we would just see the arrival of white-van booze or an increase in duty-free souvenir's.

Perhaps the best way to quell the problems caused by alcohol would be instead of restricting its sale, we loosen the tight time-limits which cause us to race against the clock. Certain parts of mainland Europe have no limits on the time alcohol can be sold/served yet unlike us they suffer less alcohol related violence as drink can be enjoyed at a leisurely pace. Here we have to down as much as possible in a short space of time before everyone gets herded onto the streets at the same time. This is when there is a spike in incidents of violence. For those who are still determined to cause alcohol fuelled mayhem, let them pay for the damage caused financially and I don't just mean by way of a court fine and personal compensation for injuries received by the victim, but also by way of financial recompense for any property wrecked and the cost of the emergency services used to deal with their antics. When faced with thousands of pounds of costs I'm sure working people would soon wise up and those on benefits unable to pay the price should have them taken away from then.

That is just our thoughts on the matter, but of course what is important is that this bill was already defeated outright previously and the majority of experts have advised against it, yet the SNP are again showing they care not for the expert opinion and will do as they please regardless of how little support they have, which brings us onto the next law they have proposed, one which is also very unpopular yet they will no doubt push through regardless...........

- Do you think homosexuals should be allowed to marry in religious buildings?

At the moment homo's are allowed to enter into civil partnerships, which should be good enough for them but the SNP launched a consultation in September asking if civil or religious marriage should be allowed for gay people. As could be expected given the distasteful nature of the proposal, there has been widespread concerns and disapproval raised from a wide spectrum of groups. Now forgive me if I am being presumptuous here, but I am starting to see a pattern that the SNP are tending towards pushing through legislation that is unpopular and against the experts advice, and true to form Sturgeon has already stated that all views would be listened to, but added that ministers "tended towards the initial view" that same-sex marriage should be introduced.

There you have it - that is an almost certain guarantee that as usual they will ignore the majority opinion and do as they please. Just who will benefit from this law - the assorted collection of degenerate queers nestled amongst the SNP's ranks? At the moment, Scotland is still a majority Christian country and it quite clearly states within the bible that homosexuality is an abomination and a sin of the highest order - Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve after all. Going on that basis alone, just why would any homo's want to get married in a church even if the opportunity was afforded to them? Probably the type who know that being homosexual goes against the natural order of things, but take out the frustration of their sordid and shameful lives by provocatively throwing their disgusting lifestyle choice down the throats of normal people. As we have written before it is these "gay pride" types that give other homos an even worse name!!

What is interesting about this proposal though is that the legislation will offend the very people Allah Salmond holds close to his heart - the Muslims. Will Allah Salmond force the Muslims to accept gay marriages within their mosques? I'm sure we all know the answer to that one as homosexuality is strictly forbidden by Islam and those perpetrators within Islamic countries caught engaging in homosexual relationships are normally executed. Don't be fooled though, there is indeed plenty of homosexual activity within the Islamic community, but they have their get out clause prepared in that it is not forbidden within the Quran to have sex with a man, it is only forbidden to love another man!! No, mosques in this country will gladly endorse marriages between 14 year old (and younger) cousins but there is no way in jahannam they will ever allow gay marriage in their places of worship - big Eck knows this and so we decided to test the water and contact the SNP on this very subject. Below is a copy of the emails between ourselves and the SNP:

As you can clearly see from that email above, "Susan" (last name ommited by herself) states that "religious organisations would not be forced to carry out marriages against their beliefs." Now I'm certainly no religious expert, but I'm pretty sure (with the exception of Satanism and possibly Buddhism) most religions have a common belief in their condemning of homosexuality, therefore if they are not forced to perform gay marriages then surely this law is defunct from the start? This is where things take a nasty turn though, for with the moral corruption of our national piety there is in fact a church in the City run by a queer minister who will be more than accommodating when it comes to performing these abominations - namely the Queens Cross Church. Can we therefore expect our city to be swamped by homos wanting a church wedding? Of course this is a church only following the denomination of the Church of Scotland so will Allah force other denominations, such as Catholic, to allow these sham weddings to take place? No doubt he will as it is easy to bash Christianity nowadays but one thing is almost a dead certainty - he will not dare force his beloved Muslims to perform gay marriages for fear they withdraw their financial support of his crooked party. (more on that later....!)

As you can see, this is yet again more legislation from the SNP that is not needed and in fact extremely unpopular with a large percentage of the population, but because of the independence obsessed voters they can do as they please regardless. I apologise if it sounds like we are harping on about this, but people must realise that there is far more to the SNP than independence and it is upto us to educate them.

This article will be continued ASAP as there is a lot more to be said on the true nature of the SNP.